Friday

new term has slipped into the lexicon: “green fatigue.”


When an old-economy warhorse General Motors blares to BusinessWeek that it must “Live Green or Die,” it’s safe to say things are changing around here. But if marketers don’t fix step in now to counteract consumers’ green fatigue, that revolution will come to a screeching halt, according to SB’08 co-chair Jacquelyn Ottman, who kicked off the first official day of the conference with green-branding call to arms.

Branding experts are stepping up in the clean tech, natural personal care, and green building sectors. But not all clients are well served, said Ottman. The culprit? Marketing messages laced with squishy terms like “renewable,” “green,” “environmentally friendly.” READ ON ::.


Via* Sustainable Media life

cradle-to-cradle ::.

CRADLE-TO-CRADLE
A phrase invented by Walter R. Stahel in the 1970s and popularized by William McDonough and Michael Braungart in their 2002 book of the same name. This framework seeks to create production techniques that are not just efficient but are essentially waste free. In cradle-to-cradle production all material inputs and outputs are seen either as technical or biological nutrients. Technical nutrients can be recycled or reused with no loss of quality and biological nutrients composted or consumed. By contrast cradle to grave refers to a company taking responsibility for the disposal of goods it has produced, but not necessarily putting products’ constituent components back into service.


.:: ideas ::. connect@3pointzero.org